Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 8,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diplomacy & Multilateralism results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 3,505 hits . Analysis detected 18,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,460 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,907 of 37,536 keywords). This Diplomacy & Multilateralism is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group. Diplomacy & Multilateralism
Keyword details
Total words: 25,460
Article count: 2
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles25.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst