Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dior results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 1,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,815 of 37,536 keywords). This Dior is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Dior
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
64%Dior (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,520
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos