Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dilip Shanghvi results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 297 hits . Analysis detected 2,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,070 of 37,536 keywords). This Dilip Shanghvi is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Dilip Shanghvi
Keyword details
Total words: 4,528
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst