Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digitalization results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 650 hits. Analysis detected 1,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,341 of 37,326 keywords). This Digitalization is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
Digitalization
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
70%Digitalization (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,224
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510069.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 29.2%29.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Keyword 29.2%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos