Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Digital Diplomacy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 727 hits . Analysis detected 4,353 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,352 of 35,718 keywords). This Digital Diplomacy is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Digital Diplomacy
Keyword details
Total words: 3,780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst