Keyword summary
15% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dies results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 873 hits . Analysis detected 2,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,264 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,799 of 37,530 keywords). This Dies is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Dies
Keyword details
Total words: 3,264
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.9% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 26.8% 26.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 26.8%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst