Keyword summary
79%1 analyzed article/video608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dictator results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 2,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,108 of 37,536 keywords). This Dictator is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Dictator
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
76%Dictator (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,824
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.8%8.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos