Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video363 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diana Russini results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 1,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,758 of 37,536 keywords). This Diana Russini is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Diana Russini
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
74%Diana Russini (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,452
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

74% percentile
025507510074.0% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 34.8%34.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos