Keyword summary
ā 53% 1 analyzed article/video 898 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dialog Cafe results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 1,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,694 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ā 34% (24,805 of 37,536 keywords). This Dialog Cafe is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Dialog Cafe
Keyword details
Total words: 2,694
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst