Keyword summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diadems results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 2,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,769 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (13,501 of 37,536 keywords). This Diadems is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Diadems
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠64%Diadems (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,769
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510064.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos