Keyword summary
37%2 analyzed articles/videos1,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Desire Doue results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Recency Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,232 hits. Analysis detected 4,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,784 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,828 of 37,536 keywords). This Desire Doue is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Desire Doue
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
21%Desire Doue (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,784
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate