Keyword summary
37% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Desire Doue results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Recency Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,232 hits . Analysis detected 4,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,784 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,828 of 37,536 keywords). This Desire Doue is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Desire Doue
Keyword details
Total words: 7,784
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst