Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Derek Schmidt results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 317 hits . Analysis detected 2,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,369 keywords). This Derek Schmidt is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Derek Schmidt
Keyword details
Total words: 1,602
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst