Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Derek Schmidt results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 2,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,369 keywords). This Derek Schmidt is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Derek Schmidt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Derek Schmidt (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,602
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 19.8%19.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos