Keyword summary
29%1 analyzed article/video860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Derecho Internacional results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 326 hits. Analysis detected 1,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,031 of 37,536 keywords). This Derecho Internacional is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
Derecho Internacional
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
36%Derecho Internacional (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos