Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Derangement results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Horn Effect , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 63.4% saturation with 865 hits . Analysis detected 5,529 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,365 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.5% and a BS Rank of 98% (852 of 37,536 keywords). This Derangement is worse (more manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Derangement
Keyword details
Total words: 1,365
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
98% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.7% percentile 14.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 63.4% 63.4% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 35.9% 35.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 42.3% 42.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 44.7% 44.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 27.0% 27.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Ad Hominem: Keyword 63.4%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 44.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 42.3%, sitewide 15.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 35.9%, sitewide 1.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 27.0%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Keyword 26.4%, sitewide 26.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 8.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 0.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst