Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Voters results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 52.4% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 1,522 faulty-reasoning hits from 580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,913 of 37,536 keywords). This Democratic Voters is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Democratic Voters
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
95%Democratic Voters (selected)11%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 580
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

95% percentile
025507510094.9% percentile
10.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles580 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 52.4%52.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 29.5%29.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 29.8%29.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 38.8%38.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.7%6.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 52.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 38.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 29.8%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 29.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos