Keyword summary
98% 1 analyzed article/video 546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Nominee results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 219 hits . Analysis detected 2,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,638 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,024 of 37,536 keywords). This Democratic Nominee is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Democratic Nominee
Keyword details
Total words: 1,638
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.0% percentile 5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst