Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Convention results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 349 hits . Analysis detected 2,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,705 of 37,536 keywords). This Democratic Convention is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Democratic Convention
Keyword details
Total words: 3,304
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst