Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delta Chat results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Overconfidence Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 350 hits. Analysis detected 3,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (21,353 of 37,536 keywords). This Delta Chat is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group.
Delta Chat
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠44%Delta Chat (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510043.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos