Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Defense Spending Bill results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 1,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Defense Spending Bill is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Defense Spending Bill
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Defense Spending Bill (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 972
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles972 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 25.5%25.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos