Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Defense Spending Bill results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 1,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Defense Spending Bill is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Defense Spending Bill
Keyword details
Total words: 972
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles972 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 25.5% 25.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst