Keyword summary
⁠11%2 analyzed articles/videos3,462 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deep Learning results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Hasty Generalization, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,120 hits. Analysis detected 6,126 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,828 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (31,613 of 36,446 keywords). This Deep Learning is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Deep Learning
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠14%Deep Learning (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,828
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos