Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Debussy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 1,458 hits . Analysis detected 4,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Debussy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Debussy
Keyword details
Total words: 3,444
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 42.3% 42.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 35.3% 35.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 42.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 35.3%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst