Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Death Cap results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Loss Aversion, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 581 hits. Analysis detected 4,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,974 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,415 of 37,536 keywords). This Death Cap is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Death Cap
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
86%Death Cap (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,974
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.6% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos