Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dean John Sauer results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 416 hits. Analysis detected 2,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (9,565 of 37,536 keywords). This Dean John Sauer is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Dean John Sauer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
75%Dean John Sauer (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,324
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510074.5% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos