Keyword summary
22%1 analyzed article/video713 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dean Connors results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 969 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,139 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,680 of 37,536 keywords). This Dean Connors is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Dean Connors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
16%Dean Connors (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,139
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos