Keyword summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deadpool & Wolverine results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 410 hits . Analysis detected 3,457 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (12,753 of 34,832 keywords). This Deadpool & Wolverine is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Deadpool & Wolverine
Keyword details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst