Keyword summary
37% 1 analyzed article/video 1,901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daytime Tv results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 825 hits . Analysis detected 5,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (27,368 of 35,866 keywords). This Daytime Tv is better (less manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. Daytime Tv
Keyword details
Total words: 7,604
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst