Keyword summary
97% 1 analyzed article/video 1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Starkey results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 63.8% saturation with 1,930 hits . Analysis detected 5,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,858 of 37,536 keywords). This David Starkey is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. David Starkey
Keyword details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.1% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 63.8% 63.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 25.5% 25.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.4% 24.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 63.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst