Keyword summary
67% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,661 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Sacks results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 898 hits . Analysis detected 11,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,026 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,274 of 37,536 keywords). This David Sacks is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. David Sacks
Keyword details
Total words: 10,026
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst