Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,585 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Rittenhouse results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 496 hits . Analysis detected 4,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,041 of 37,536 keywords). This David Rittenhouse is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. David Rittenhouse
Keyword details
Total words: 6,340
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst