Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 780 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Miller results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 2,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,101 of 36,328 keywords). This David Miller is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. David Miller
Keyword details
Total words: 3,120
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst