Keyword summary
ā 60% 1 analyzed article/video 899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Lindsay Abaire results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 358 hits . Analysis detected 2,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,697 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ā 64% (13,790 of 37,536 keywords). This David Lindsay Abaire is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. David Lindsay Abaire
Keyword details
Total words: 2,697
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst