Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Gutman results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 64.1% saturation with 152 hits . Analysis detected 862 faulty-reasoning hits from 237 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of 100% (315 of 37,536 keywords). This David Gutman is worse (more manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. David Gutman
Keyword details
Total words: 237
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 99.2% percentile 21.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles237 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 60.8% 60.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 54.0% 54.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 49.0% 49.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 64.1% 64.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 23.6% 23.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 64.1%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 60.8%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 54.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 49.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 8.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 0.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 9.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst