Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 445 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Fliehr results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 2,224 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,468 of 37,533 keywords). This David Fliehr is worse (more manipulative) than 80.10% of the peer group. David Fliehr
Keyword details
Total words: 1,780
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.1% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst