Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Duke results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 452 hits . Analysis detected 3,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,467 of 37,536 keywords). This David Duke is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. David Duke
Keyword details
Total words: 2,812
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.8% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst