Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Chase results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 624 hits . Analysis detected 3,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,052 of 37,536 keywords). This David Chase is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. David Chase
Keyword details
Total words: 6,204
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst