Keyword summary
⁠28%3 analyzed articles/videos2,229 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Burke results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,270 hits. Analysis detected 4,889 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,228 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (33,958 of 37,536 keywords). This David Burke is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
David Burke
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠10%David Burke (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,228
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
02550751009.5% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos