Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Barron results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 475 hits . Analysis detected 4,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,766 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,064 of 37,536 keywords). This David Barron is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group. David Barron
Keyword details
Total words: 1,766
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.5% percentile 9.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 19.3% 19.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 26.9% 26.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst