Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video793 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Thatcher results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39.5% saturation with 939 hits. Analysis detected 4,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,379 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,127 of 37,536 keywords). This Daniel Thatcher is worse (more manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Daniel Thatcher
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
92%Daniel Thatcher (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,379
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510091.7% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 14.9%14.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 39.5%39.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 16.2%16.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 39.5%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos