Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Mcavoy results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 425 hits. Analysis detected 1,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,098 of 37,536 keywords). This Daniel Mcavoy is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Daniel Mcavoy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
47%Daniel Mcavoy (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510046.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 13.6%13.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Red Herring: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos