Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dan Strauss results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.2% saturation with 783 hits . Analysis detected 1,901 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,734 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This Dan Strauss is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Dan Strauss
Keyword details
Total words: 1,734
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 45.2% 45.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 45.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst