Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Orlovsky results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Bandwagon , and Self-Serving Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 416 hits . Analysis detected 985 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,326 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,580 of 37,536 keywords). This Dan Orlovsky is worse (more manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Dan Orlovsky
Keyword details
Total words: 1,326
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 31.4% 31.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 31.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst