Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 398 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dalilah's Law results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.9% saturation with 548 hits . Analysis detected 2,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,194 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,492 of 37,536 keywords). This Dalilah's Law is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. Dalilah's Law
Keyword details
Total words: 1,194
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
96% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.0% percentile 11.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 38.5% 38.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 45.9% 45.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 35.9% 35.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 19.9% 19.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 13.5% 13.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 45.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 38.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 35.9%, sitewide 19.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 3.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 1.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst