Keyword summary
12%1 analyzed article/video578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These D C Bottle Bill results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 1,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,312 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,410 of 37,536 keywords). This D C Bottle Bill is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
D C Bottle Bill
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
43%D C Bottle Bill (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,312
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos