Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cyclospora Outbreak Michigan results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 483 hits. Analysis detected 2,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,584 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (36,770 of 37,536 keywords). This Cyclospora Outbreak Michigan is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Cyclospora Outbreak Michigan
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 7,584
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751002.0% percentile
1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos