Keyword summary
22% 20 analyzed articles/videos 11,473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cybercrime results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 4,571 hits . Analysis detected 43,489 faulty-reasoning hits from 69,895 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,196 of 37,536 keywords). This Cybercrime is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group. Cybercrime
Keyword details
Total words: 69,895
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score20 analyzed articles69.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst