Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cuenta results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Confirmation Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 1,287 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (33,412 of 37,536 keywords). This Cuenta is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Cuenta
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠11%Cuenta (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,104
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510011.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos