Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video644 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cuban Territorial Waters results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 808 hits. Analysis detected 3,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,920 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (4,130 of 37,536 keywords). This Cuban Territorial Waters is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Cuban Territorial Waters
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠89%Cuban Territorial Waters (selected)7%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,920
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510089.0% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 42.1%42.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 42.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 4.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos