Keyword summary
60% 1 analyzed article/video 457 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crush Maga Pac results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 249 hits . Analysis detected 1,685 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (16,071 of 37,536 keywords). This Crush Maga Pac is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Crush Maga Pac
Keyword details
Total words: 1,828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.2% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst