Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crowded Field results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 295 hits . Analysis detected 2,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,037 of 37,536 keywords). This Crowded Field is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Crowded Field
Keyword details
Total words: 2,508
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.9% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst