Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Crowd Control results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 272 hits . Analysis detected 2,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,320 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Crowd Control is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Crowd Control
Keyword details
Total words: 3,320
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst